
Photo, license
A bit of heavy reading for the weekend. But aka-aki users are tough, so here we go:
One of the special features of aka-aki is actually none. It’s about the whereabouts of the members, their locations. When the location based service (LBS) hype started, every company wanted to capture as precisely as possible their users’ locations. Some services pinpoint its members on maps.
Paradoxical user needs
When we designed aka-aki, we thought about this, too. Our gut feeling was against it, and the user surveys then brought the following paradox to light: If we asked people whether they would like to see their friends on maps, many said yes, that would be practical. But asked if they were to participate in such a system, they said of course not! Who wants to be a moving target on a map?
“Make it abuser friendly”
In addition, aka-aki is indeed heavily used to discover new people – and sharing your precise location with complete strangers doesn’t seem right. Or does it? Imagine this case: I am stranded at Hamburg main station because of the regular train chaos (German rail is actually not as good as many people might think abroad). Now it would be nice to have a beer with a like-minded aka-aki member. We know that aka-aki is being used for situations like that. Although we do not specify precise locations. As Professor Franz Liebl said, who has advised us in the design: “Make aka-aki not just user friendly, but abuser friendly.” Of course he didn’t mean to make the system more cosy for abusive behaviour, but to keep it open for use in cases that we haven’t yet anticipated (an API comes to mind here).
Relative vs. absolute location
In 2006, when aka-aki was designed, we assumed users would be very cautious about their location, so we have decided to provide users only with imprecise locations. This behaviour is by design, as they say. We broke the latitude and longitude, which provided us with the phones down to four categories: near, around, in the city and the region.That means not only an intentional blurring of precise location information, but has another effect: all locations in aka-aki are relative (if the user does not voluntarily specify his residence). You do not get the absolute location of a member unless you ask them for it.
Success by omission
And it seems that we did quite well with this strategy. aka-aki is the leading location-based social network in the two countries in which we have launched so far (Germany and France). But everything changes, and so did you, our users. The fear of sharing your whereabouts, seems to diminish from day to day.
At the crossroads: more precision, but also more privacy
“More accurate location information” is by far the most requested feature in our feedback form on the website. It was also # 1 in our e-mail member survey in late 2009 and a top request from our interviews with female aka-aki members in January 2010.
As you might have noted, we don’t make changes to the location feature easily. We have imposed on us the toughest privacy regulations in our industry, we voluntary and automatically delete location data rather than storing it, we anonymize IP addresses in our log files and more.
“Just make it configurable!”
There is a (seemingly) universal answer to all these questions of course: Just make it configurable! But it’s not that simple. A product that wants to be good for everybody, will end up not being good for anyone. Because it’s complexity and uncertainty that comes with configurability. And users tend to leave the default settings as they are. Even when it comes to privacy, most users are not willing to make extensive settings (see Facebook).
This may not be true for the readers of this blog, which show above-average interest for the services they use – and this is not the norm. Most users muddle through (no matter what the service) and are happy when they get their things done quickly (as Steve Krug says).
Opportunities and limitations of location based services
Imagine a scenario like this: I wish that all my friends could see that I’m in the club such-and-such, but not x, because she’ll want to join the party and really don’t want her here tonight. Who’d want to set up something like this on a mobile phone?
So we have to realize that location based services aren’t appropriate for all cases of social interaction. And concentrate on the cases that actually occur, while keeping aka-aki open for the scenarios that we don’t see today. The crucial question is: Why do I share my location with whom – and how accurately? And why will I do it in the future?
I look forward to your feedback.
Greetings!
Gabriel (aka-aki-team)